Coinbase is expected to reveal details about prediction markets and tokenized equities at a product showcase on December 17, 2025, with reports indicating that tokenized stocks are being built in-house.
In parallel, Ondo Finance has announced plans to offer tokenized U.S. stocks and ETFs on Solana in early 2026, signaling that tokenized equities are becoming a distinct category, not a side project
If you buy Coinbase Stocks ($COIN), you’re buying equity in a company that benefits from trading activity, custody, and new product lines (including, potentially, tokenized equities). As of December 17, 2025, COIN traded around $252.61.
If you hold $EDEL, you’re taking a bet on a different layer: the on-chain market infrastructure that makes tokenized equities useful after you buy them: lending, borrowing, collateral, and shorting mechanics.
And yes, you can do both. A lot of “future of finance” themes end up being a portfolio problem, not a single-ticker problem.
Coinbase has been moving toward tokenized equities for a while. Reuters reported earlier this year that Coinbase was seeking SEC approval pathways to offer blockchain-based stocks, also known as “tokenized equities.” That regulatory angle matters because tokenized securities still sit under securities rules.
Brian Armstrong’s public view is straightforward: markets that “close” are outdated. In a November 2025 post, he argued that tokenized assets enable “instant settlement and 24/7 availability.” That’s the pitch retail investors instantly understand: fewer delays, fewer intermediaries, more accessibility.
Ondo’s announcements add a second datapoint. Yahoo Finance reports Ondo plans to bring tokenized U.S. stocks and ETFs to Solana early next year. When both a major U.S. exchange and a major RWA issuer talk like this within days of each other, it’s hard to call it “niche.”
But the market commentary isn’t all cheerleading. Reuters has also covered concerns from traditional exchanges and others about investor protection, marketing clarity, and what rights tokenized stock products actually confer. In other words: the upside is real, and so is the fine print.
This is exactly why the “infrastructure layer” conversation is heating up. If tokenized equities become common, people will ask: can I lend them, borrow against them, hedge them, or earn yield on them like institutions already do in TradFi?
Edel Finance is built around that “what happens after” question. The project describes itself as an on-chain securities lending and borrowing infrastructure for tokenized equities — designed to replace opaque prime-broker style workflows with transparent, automated markets.
Practically, Edel aims to let holders lend tokenized equities to earn yield, and let borrowers use those equities (or borrow stable assets against them) under on-chain collateral rules. The project also frames itself as infrastructure rather than a broker or exchange: it doesn’t custody user assets, and it sits on top of issuance rails provided by others.
If you want to see what this looks like in practice, Edel’s Testnet and products pages lay out the building blocks in one place.
Edel’s team puts the thesis plainly: “Tokenized equities now exist, but without a native securities lending layer, they remain financially underutilized.”
That line also explains why $EDEL isn’t the same bet as Coinbase Stocks ($COIN). Coinbase can win on distribution and trust. Edel is trying to win in the market structure.
Here’s the subjective part: if tokenized equities take off, the most valuable platforms might not be the ones with the nicest “Buy” button. They might be the ones that turn idle assets into working capital.
That’s the “Aave for stocks” comparison. Aave made on-chain lending feel legible: supply, borrow, rates move with utilization, and risk is enforced by smart contracts. Edel applies that pattern to equities — so your tokenized stocks don’t just sit there waiting to be “up or down.”
And Ondo’s repeated push into tokenized stocks/ETFs helps validate the direction: mindshare is forming, not just product roadmaps.
The honest caveat: infrastructure plays can be slower burns. They depend on volume, integrations, risk parameters, and trust in the mechanics. But when they work, they often become the rails others build on.
Two different bets on the same theme: distribution vs infrastructure.
If you’re weighing $COIN against $EDEL (or thinking about holding both), do three things:
Not financial advice. Just the checklist that keeps you from buying a narrative instead of a product.
$COIN is equity in Coinbase, the company — exposed to business execution, regulation, market cycles, and product expansion. $EDEL is exposure to on-chain infrastructure designed for tokenized equities markets — more “protocol rails” than “platform brand.”
It turns tokenized equities from passive holdings into assets you can potentially lend, borrow against, or use for hedging — closer to how institutional equity markets function today (with more transparency if done well).
Many investors split exposure across layers: an exchange/operator (like $COIN), an issuer/asset layer (where Ondo plays), and infrastructure that enables lending/borrowing (where Edel positions itself). The “best” depends on your risk tolerance and time horizon.
They’re different bets. Exchange stocks tend to track business fundamentals and market cycles. Infrastructure tokens tend to track adoption, integrations, and on-chain activity. If you want diversification, mixing the layers is the point.
If you believe tokenized equities go mainstream, you can argue for both: $COIN for distribution and regulatory navigation, and infrastructure projects like Edel for the “capital markets plumbing” that makes tokenized equities behave like real markets.
