A version of this article originally appeared in Quartz’s members-only Weekend Brief newsletter. Quartz members get access to exclusive newsletters and more. Sign up here.
For years, cryptocurrency evangelists promised digital money would revolutionize finance. Instead, most crypto became a vehicle for speculation, memes, and the occasional spectacular fraud. But this summer, something different happened: Wall Street started paying attention to stablecoins.
The passage of the GENIUS Act last month marked a legitimacy turning point, providing the first comprehensive U.S. regulation for digital tokens backed by conventional assets like Treasury bills and bank deposits. Suddenly, stablecoins — once dismissed as crypto curiosities — are being embraced by companies across a wide swatch of industries.
The reason? Unlike volatile cryptocurrencies, stablecoins promise the infrastructure benefits of digital money without the wild price swings, potentially replacing expensive, slow traditional payments with transactions that settle in minutes for pennies.
To understand why this matters, it helps to grasp what makes stablecoins different from the crypto tokens that came before. Think of Bitcoin and Ethereum as digital commodities. They fluctuate wildly based on market sentiment, making them poor candidates for everyday transactions. Stablecoins, by contrast, are designed to maintain a steady value by being backed 1:1 with conventional assets. The largest stablecoin, Tether (USDT), is theoretically worth exactly $1 because each token is backed by a dollar’s worth of Treasury bills, cash, or other liquid assets.
This stability transforms the use case entirely, allowing stablecoins to function as actual currency for payments while leveraging blockchain technology for faster, cheaper transactions.
The distinction becomes clearer when compared to Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs), which have sparked fierce political debate. Both stablecoins and CBDCs are digital representations of money, but the control structure is fundamentally different. CBDCs would be issued and controlled directly by central banks like the Federal Reserve. Think of them as digital cash that could offer perfect privacy or perfect surveillance, depending on design choices.
The political battle lines are clear. Republican lawmakers have moved to ban CBDC development, fearing government surveillance, while embracing privately-issued stablecoins. Meanwhile, European officials like European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde worry that widespread stablecoin adoption amounts to “the privatization of money.”
With that crucial distinction (hopefully) established, back to the GENIUS Act and why it represents such a watershed moment for the industry.
The legislation does three key things that had eluded stablecoins for years. First, it settles the existential question of what stablecoins actually are, confirming they are not securities and therefore don’t face the regulatory maze that has ensnared other crypto tokens. Second, it requires full backing by safe assets like Treasury bills and bank deposits, addressing long-standing concerns about whether stablecoin issuers actually hold the reserves they claim. Third, it subjects issuers to anti-money laundering rules and regular audits, bringing them under the same compliance framework as traditional financial institutions.
The result has been an immediate rush of institutional interest. JPMorgan Chase, whose CEO Jamie Dimon once called Bitcoin a “fraud,” announced plans for its own stablecoin-like product called JPMorgan Deposit Token, according to CNBC. Interactive Brokers is considering launching a stablecoin for customers and enabling 24/7 funding of brokerage accounts, according to Reuters. Even retail giants like Amazon and Walmart are reportedly exploring their own tokens, which could work like supercharged gift cards that cut out credit card fees.
The numbers tell the story of an industry hitting its stride. There’s already $263 billion in stablecoins circulating, up 60% from last year, according to The Economist, while Standard Chartered projects that figure could reach $2 trillion within three years. Transaction volumes already surpass those of Visa and Mastercard combined, driven largely by cross-border payments where stablecoins can replace $15 wire transfers with transactions costing pennies.
This surge in adoption creates the very paradox that has regulators on edge. The more useful stablecoins become, the more disruptive they will be to existing financial systems. The American Bankers Association has already sounded the alarm, warning that if banks lose just 10% of their $19 trillion in retail deposits to stablecoins, it would meaningfully increase their funding costs and squeeze lending capacity.
Yet for an industry built on the promise of disruption, these concerns sound more like validation than warning. The real test will come when the first major financial crisis hits a stablecoin-dependent system, or when geopolitical tensions force governments to choose between embracing dollar-denominated tokens or protecting monetary sovereignty. With regulatory clarity finally in place and Wall Street’s seal of approval, stablecoins have moved from crypto curiosity to financial infrastructure. Whether that infrastructure proves as reliable as the system it’s replacing remains to be seen.
