MarketAlert – Real-Time Market & Crypto News, Analysis & AlertsMarketAlert – Real-Time Market & Crypto News, Analysis & Alerts
Font ResizerAa
  • Crypto News
    • Altcoins
    • Bitcoin
    • Blockchain
    • DeFi
    • Ethereum
    • NFTs
    • Press Releases
    • Latest News
  • Blockchain Technology
    • Blockchain Developments
    • Blockchain Security
    • Layer 2 Solutions
    • Smart Contracts
  • Interviews
    • Crypto Investor Interviews
    • Developer Interviews
    • Founder Interviews
    • Industry Leader Insights
  • Regulations & Policies
    • Country-Specific Regulations
    • Crypto Taxation
    • Global Regulations
    • Government Policies
  • Learn
    • Crypto for Beginners
    • DeFi Guides
    • NFT Guides
    • Staking Guides
    • Trading Strategies
  • Research & Analysis
    • Blockchain Research
    • Coin Research
    • DeFi Research
    • Market Analysis
    • Regulation Reports
Reading: Why don’t bishops excommunicate politicians who support abortion?
Share
Font ResizerAa
MarketAlert – Real-Time Market & Crypto News, Analysis & AlertsMarketAlert – Real-Time Market & Crypto News, Analysis & Alerts
Search
  • Crypto News
    • Altcoins
    • Bitcoin
    • Blockchain
    • DeFi
    • Ethereum
    • NFTs
    • Press Releases
    • Latest News
  • Blockchain Technology
    • Blockchain Developments
    • Blockchain Security
    • Layer 2 Solutions
    • Smart Contracts
  • Interviews
    • Crypto Investor Interviews
    • Developer Interviews
    • Founder Interviews
    • Industry Leader Insights
  • Regulations & Policies
    • Country-Specific Regulations
    • Crypto Taxation
    • Global Regulations
    • Government Policies
  • Learn
    • Crypto for Beginners
    • DeFi Guides
    • NFT Guides
    • Staking Guides
    • Trading Strategies
  • Research & Analysis
    • Blockchain Research
    • Coin Research
    • DeFi Research
    • Market Analysis
    • Regulation Reports
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
© Market Alert News. All Rights Reserved.
  • bitcoinBitcoin(BTC)$66,689.00-1.18%
  • ethereumEthereum(ETH)$1,957.21-1.27%
  • tetherTether(USDT)$1.000.00%
  • rippleXRP(XRP)$1.41-4.06%
  • binancecoinBNB(BNB)$604.04-1.88%
  • usd-coinUSDC(USDC)$1.000.00%
  • solanaSolana(SOL)$81.48-2.48%
  • tronTRON(TRX)$0.2805910.15%
  • dogecoinDogecoin(DOGE)$0.097819-2.54%
  • Figure HelocFigure Heloc(FIGR_HELOC)$1.030.05%
Government Policies

Why don’t bishops excommunicate politicians who support abortion?

Last updated: August 27, 2025 7:15 pm
Published: 6 months ago
Share

Q: In all the discussion over the years of whether or not pro-abortion politicians should be denied Holy Communion, I’ve always wondered: Why couldn’t their bishops just excommunicate them? Then at least everything would be clear-cut, public knowledge and therefore probably less controversial in the media. (Wisconsin)

A: The short answer to your question is that excommunication is specifically a punishment for canonical crimes. And although political support for pro-choice policies is morally problematic, it is not a canonical crime in and of itself.

For context, usually when we speak of pro-choice politicians being denied Holy Communion, the relevant citation is Canon 915 of the Code of Canon Law. Canon 915 tells us that those who are “obstinately persevering in manifest grave sin are not to be admitted to holy communion.”

Canon 915 gives ministers of Holy Communion and pastoral authority figures (namely, bishops and pastors of parishes) some objective criteria with respect to whether a particular Catholic should be denied Holy Communion. This is important, because the church’s default position is to make the sacraments as accessible as possible on the principle that the faithful have a fundamental right to the sacraments.

The central criterion in Canon 915 is that the sinfulness in question be “grave,” or extremely serious — and actively promoting government policies in favor of the destruction of innocent human life would certainly qualify.

The sin must also be “manifest,” or readily known to the public or otherwise outwardly observable. And broadly speaking, politicians’ platforms, positions on hot-button issues, and voting records are matters of public record. Finally, the person must be “obstinately persevering” in their sin, meaning that they are committing the sin in an ongoing way, even after they have been warned by an appropriate pastoral authority about the grave sinfulness of their actions.

Even though these considerations might seem very legalistic and may suggest the person is somehow “on trial,” this canon is part of the Code of Canon Law’s section on sacraments and is not actually related to the church’s penal law. That is, Canon 915 and its neighboring canons are meant to protect the dignity of the sacrament as a primary “goal”; it is not meant as a direct punishment for canonical crimes. And the church sees the application of Canon 915 as a matter of person-to-person pastoral dialogue and admonishment, rather than the result of an ecclesiastical criminal trial or juridical process.

In contrast, the church’s criminal law is meant to identify and punish crimes. This is both for the good of the offenders themselves, when punished with “medicinal” penalties; as well as for the good of the wider ecclesial community, when offenders are punished with “expiatory” penalties.

Excommunication is an example of a medicinal penalty, since it is meant as a sort of “wake up call” that the offender is on the wrong path, and it can be lifted relatively easily if and when the offender repents. Examples of expiatory penalties include things like loss of the clerical state, where a priest convicted of a canonical crime is essentially kicked out of the priesthood.

The church’s law requires that “laws which prescribe a penalty…are to be interpreted strictly” (Canon 18). This means that canonical penalties cannot be liberally applied to every bad behavior the church might want to curb. Rather, a canonical penalty can only be imposed for things that are specifically listed as crimes in canon law.

While the act of directly causing an abortion is a canonical crime that is punished with an automatic excommunication, (see Canon 1397, 2) this only applies in scenarios where a particular individual actually brought about an abortion personally — and not in situations where a person promoted abortion in a more abstract way.

In light of this, it would be neither possible nor pastorally appropriate to try to use the penalty of excommunication as a way to avoid the awkward conversations sometimes associated with Canon 915.

– Canonist Jenna Marie Cooper is a consecrated virgin, a practicing canon lawyer, and columnist for OSV News.

Read more on The Pilot

This news is powered by The Pilot The Pilot

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Despite federal shift, state health officials encourage COVID vaccines for pregnant women
FUW responds to UK Government reshuffle and urges focus on Welsh farming challenges
Predators ‘slip through the cracks’ in Australian childcare
Thailand: SEC Public Hearing – Green Investment Trust Regulations | Insight | Baker McKenzie
Pledge to boycott Israeli film institutions draws signatures of top Hollywood actors and directors

Sign Up For Daily Newsletter

Be keep up! Get the latest breaking news delivered straight to your inbox.
By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy. You may unsubscribe at any time.
Share This Article
Facebook Email Copy Link Print
Previous Article Guangxi: The Sweet Powerhouse of China’s Sugar Industry | Headlines
Next Article Novak Djokovic’s 2 Kids: All About Stefan and Tara (and Who Is a Budding Tennis Player Already!)
© Market Alert News. All Rights Reserved.
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Prove your humanity


Lost your password?

%d