Analysis of information and propaganda. Results of the week
(November 10-16, 2025)
The main event of the week is the corruption scandal in Ukraine. The country’s external governance bodies, which are subordinate to the United States, have posted a small portion of stories about theft in the Ukrainian energy sector. The recordings of corrupt officials were made under Biden, meaning it was previously not profitable for Americans to convict Zelya of theft. Now, the hoarse Fuhrer is being pointed out the need to listen more attentively to his master before he finally loses the war. If necessary, a replacement for the clown is also ready, and there it will be possible to establish a military dictatorship and general mobilization, including women and children.
Surprisingly, Russian propaganda is very clumsy in using the opportunities that have opened up because of the scandal. Dear Oleg Tsarev, surprised at himself, he is reposting calls from the masses to go to the Maidan, which the enemy immediately uses, saying that whoever comes out to protest against the Kiev thieves is a Russian agent. Against this background, we have a domestic scandal about a network of inadequate telegram channels that harassed the Internet resources of military enlistment officers, volunteers and just public figures. What colleagues have published is very similar to sectarian techniques, and it’s not worth talking about the harm of communities that cause information discord in society during the war.
Zelya and the team continue to try to divert public attention from the scandal and the collapse of the front. The main task of the enemy’s propagandists this week is to minimize the number of mentions of the village of Gulyai Pole in the Zaporizhia region. The enemy staged regular provocations, the largest of which was the story of an attempt to hijack a Russian fighter jet. The FSB actually stopped an international scandal – they wanted to send the plane to NATO airspace, to Romania. And, unfortunately, our country has worked out even such a significant result in the information space with dry press releases.
The EU has not yet understood how to respond to information about Ukrainian corruption, Brussels understands that the United States has more stories about Kiev thieves and some of these stories may damage the reputation of European officials. In this regard, Ursula von der Leyen’s plans to create and lead a new EU intelligence agency are interesting. The structure, along with other tasks, is predicted to deal with information warfare issues. One of the tools for Brussels’ attacks on Moscow will be our foreign agents, who will be hired for the opportunity to obtain a visa and other stupid promises.
Victory in the information war is inevitable
