A federal judge on Monday ruled Planned Parenthood clinics nationwide must continue to be reimbursed for Medicaid funding as the nation’s largest abortion provider fights President Donald Trump’s administration over efforts to defund the organization in his signature tax legislation.
One called abortion a “barbaric practice.” Another referred to himself as a “zealot” for the anti-abortion movement. Several played prominent roles in defending their state’s abortion restrictions in court and in cases that had national impact, including on access to medication abortion.
As President Donald Trump pushes the Senate to confirm his federal judicial nominees, a review by The Associated Press shows about half of them have revealed anti-abortion views, been associated with anti-abortion groups or defended abortion restrictions.
Trump offered shifting positions on the issue while claiming he wants to leave questions of abortion access to the states. But his court nominees will have lifetime appointments and be in position to roll back abortion access long after the Republican president leaves the White House.
Bernadette Meyler, a professor of constitutional law at Stanford University, said judicial nominations “are a way of federally shaping the abortion question without going through Congress or making a big, explicit statement.”
People are also reading… Normal man identified after fatal bike crash in Comlara Park What to eat at the 2025 Illinois State Fair 1 dead, 3 injured in crash on I-55 near Pontiac Friday morning ‘Exactly what Pontiac needs’: Route 66 RoadHouse offering farm-to-table eats Officials: Heyworth man seen swinging machete threatened, tried to bite police chief Bloomington man gets 8 years in prison, ordered to pay $15K in meth, financial cases Woman sentenced to 5 years in McLean County robbery case A love story — and a Pantagraph cameo — a half-century in the making Prosecutors: Bloomington man tries to kill a woman, stabs teenage girl McLean County officials are investigating after a man was found dead in Comlara Park Illinois farmers turn to agroforestry for profit, soil health and crop diversity Bloomington man accused of stabbing woman, injuring 2 others ‘Armed and dangerous’ man sought after 2 officers shot in Ford County 2 hospitalized after shooting in rural Washburn ISP asks for public’s help in search for suspect in shooting of Gibson City officers
“It’s a way to cover up a little bit what is happening in the abortion sphere compared to legislation or executive orders that may be more visible, dramatic and spark more backlash,” she said.
Of the 17 judicial nominees so far in Trump’s second term, at least eight argued in favor of abortion restrictions or against expanded abortion access. No such records could be found for the other nine, nor did the AP review find evidence that any of Trump’s judicial nominees support increased access to abortion.
“Every nominee of the President represents his promises to the American people and aligns with the U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark ruling,” a White House spokesman, Harrison Fields, said in a statement that referenced the 2022 decision overturning the constitutional right to abortion established in Roe v. Wade.
Trump’s first term also had an enduring impact on the courts, appointing 234 judges. By the end of that term, more than one-quarter of active federal judges were nominated by Trump, including three Supreme Court justices who helped overturn Roe v. Wade.
In his second term, all but five of his 17 nominees are from states that went for Trump in 2024 and where Republicans pushed severe abortion restrictions. Among them, four nominees are from Missouri and five are from Florida.
Here is a look at the nominees who tried to reduce abortion access or advocated for restrictions. They did not respond to requests for comment:
Whitney Hermandorfer
Hermandorfer, who was confirmed to the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, built much of her relatively short career as a lawyer around challenging former President Joe Biden’s policies related to abortion and transgender rights. She challenged a federal law requiring employers to provide workers with reasonable accommodations to get abortion care, as well as Title X regulations that required providers who receive funding through the program to give information about abortions to patients if asked.
Hermandorfer defended Tennessee’s abortion ban, one of the strictest in the country, in court and tried to dismiss a lawsuit from doctors seeking clarification on exemptions to the ban. She said abortion deserves special scrutiny because “this is the only medical procedure that terminates a life.”
Maria Lanahan
Lanahan, a district court nominee in Missouri, helped write the state’s complaint in a lawsuit that had sweeping national implications for access to medication abortion. The case challenged the FDA approval of the abortion pill mifepristone despite decades of evidence showing the drug is safe and effective.
The lawyer supported Missouri’s effort to strip Planned Parenthood of state Medicaid funding and defended the state’s abortion ban after a group of clergy sued, arguing it violated the state constitution’s protections for religious freedom.
Jordan Pratt
Pratt, a nominee for the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, called abortion a “barbaric practice” and “one of the most severe invasions of personal rights imaginable” in an amicus brief supporting Florida’s 15-week abortion ban. The state now bans the procedure at six weeks.
Listen now and subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | RSS Feed | SoundStack | All Of Our Podcasts
In 2025, Pratt struck down a Florida law that created a judicial waiver program for minors seeking to have abortions without parental consent. The lawyer also worked for the Alliance Defending Freedom, a conservative legal organization that opposes abortion and has sued to reverse the FDA approval of mifepristone.
John Guard
Guard, also nominated to fill for the same district, defended Florida’s then-15-week abortion ban in court as the state’s chief deputy attorney general.
Joshua Divine
Divine, a deputy solicitor general of Missouri who is nominated to be a district judge in the state, is representing Missouri in a case challenging the FDA approval of mifepristone. Divine co-authored the lawsuit, which includes misinformation about medication abortion, including that it “starves the baby to death in the womb.”
In his college newspaper, Divine described himself as a “zealot” for the anti-abortion movement, referred to abortion as “the killing of an innocent, genetically unique human being” and argued that life begins at fertilization.
He also stepped into a prominent role in the fight over abortion rights in the state after Missouri voters approved an abortion rights amendment in 2024. That amendment did not immediately override state laws. It left it up to abortion rights groups to ask courts to knock down abortion restrictions they believed were now unconstitutional.
During the ensuing legal battles, Divine represented the state in defending a host of abortion restrictions.
Chad Meredith
Meredith, Trump’s nominee to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky, defended the state’s abortion ban and other restrictions while he was the state’s chief deputy general counsel. That included a law requiring doctors to perform ultrasounds and describe images to abortion patients.
Bill Mercer
Mercer, a Republican state lawmaker in Montana who is nominated for a U.S. District Court judgeship in the state, repeatedly supported anti-abortion bills.
They included those that sought to ban abortion after 20 weeks of pregnancy; require a 24-hour waiting period and mandatory ultrasounds for abortion patients; require parental notification for minors to get an abortion; prohibit the use of state funding for abortions; prohibit certain insurance policies from covering abortions; and restrict what types of medical professionals can dispense medication abortion.
Jennifer Mascott
Mascott, a lawyer in the White House Counsel’s Office and a Trump nominee to the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, spoke repeatedly about abortion law in panels and interviews.
After the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, Mascott in an interview on “Fox News Live” disagreed with the argument that the decision undermined the court’s legitimacy. She said abortion issues are “more appropriately decided” by the states, elected officials in Congress and people in their local communities.
Government-politics Federal judges detail rise in threats, ‘pizza doxings,’ as Trump ramps up criticism NICHOLAS RICCARDI Associated Press Government-politics Poll shows how views of the Supreme Court have changed since 2022 abortion ruling MARK SHERMAN and AMELIA THOMSON-DEVEAUX Associated Press Nation & World Poll shows how US adults feel about legal abortion 3 years after Roe was overturned GEOFF MULVIHILL and AMELIA THOMSON-DEVEAUX Associated Press Love 0 Funny 0 Wow 0 Sad 0 Angry 0
Get Government & Politics updates in your inbox!
Stay up-to-date on the latest in local and national government and political topics with our newsletter.
Sign up! * I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.
