In the realm of economic policy, inflation has long been treated as a numerical abstraction — a percentage point on a spreadsheet, a target for central banks to chase through interest rate adjustments and fiscal maneuvers. Yet, as eloquently underscored in the recent editorial from “The Reporter Ethiopia”, titled “Beyond the Numbers: Ethiopia’s Cost-of-Living Crisis Persists,” this fixation on headline figures obscures the lived reality of millions grappling with eroded purchasing power. The piece astutely observes that Ethiopia’s reported single-digit inflation rate of 9.7% in December 2025 is little more than a “statistical mirage,” disconnected from the surging costs of essentials like food, rent, and transport that define daily survival for ordinary households. I wholeheartedly concur: the inflation discourse must be reframed not as a game of statistical manipulation by governments but as a profound question of affordability, inextricably linked to the scourge of unequal income distribution. This shift is not merely academic; it is essential for crafting policies that safeguard economic dignity and stability.
To appreciate this reframing, consider the mechanics of inflation beyond the consumer price index (CPI). Governments and international institutions often celebrate disinflationary trends as victories, yet these metrics frequently mask underlying volatilities. In Ethiopia, for instance, the CPI’s heavy weighting toward food (over 50%) should amplify the impact of staple price spikes in items like coffee, sugar, and meat. However, as I have previously argued, the reported dip to around 10% inflation amid the Ethiopian birr’s precipitous plunge — depreciating over 200% against the U.S. dollar since mid-2024 — defies the iron law of exchange rate pass-through (ERPT). A currency halved in value inexorably inflates import costs, turning essentials into unaffordable luxuries. This is no theoretical abstraction; it is evident in fuel prices surging over 100% year-on-year, cascading into higher transportation and food processing expenses. Such dynamics render official figures suspect, potentially a product of methodological sleights or data fudging, as seen when petrol prices rose by 6.6 birr per liter while inflation purportedly cooled to 10.9%.
This skepticism aligns with broader observations on Ethiopia’s economic landscape. Inflation has become a structural fixture, punishing citizens through eroded wages and heightened costs. As I noted in discussions on the matter, the public is increasingly adjusting to this permanence, using assets like used vehicles as hedges against value erosion — vehicles that appreciate over time due to limited supply, government policies, and rampant inflation. In 1971, I personally sold a used Toyota for more than its purchase price, a phenomenon rooted in these distortions. Moreover, the IMF-imposed devaluation has exacerbated this “inflation tax,” decimating income levels already strained by over a dozen new taxes. Professor Steve Hanke’s measurements, using high-frequency data, pegged Ethiopia’s true inflation at 41.4% in mid-2025 — nearly three times the official rate — highlighting how statistical games obscure the affordability crisis. For families whose budgets are dominated by food, these spikes eclipse any headline easing, transforming survival into an ordeal.
Affordability, then, emerges as the true metric of economic health, far surpassing inflation rates. It encapsulates not just price levels but the capacity of households to access necessities without sacrificing well-being. Here, unequal income distribution acts as a multiplier of misery. In economies where wealth concentrates at the top, inflation disproportionately burdens the bottom strata, whose expenditures skew heavily toward basics. The Gini coefficient, a standard measure of inequality (ranging from 0 for perfect equality to 100 for total inequality), illustrates this vividly. Globally, high Gini scores correlate with elevated poverty and cost-of-living crises, as the poor face amplified price shocks without the buffers of savings or diversified income.
Ethiopia exemplifies this nexus. With persistent food insecurity and rent surges in cities like Addis Ababa, the poorest households — those reliant on volatile staples — bear the brunt of currency volatility from the birr’s flotation 18 months ago. This mirrors my earlier critiques: the regime’s policies have inflicted rampant inflation alongside fiscal austerity, pushing affordability out of reach for many.
Yet Ethiopia is not alone. South Africa, with a Gini coefficient of 63.0 (World Bank data, latest 2014), stands as the world’s most unequal society. Here, the richest 10% command 71% of wealth, while the poorest 60% hold merely 7%, and over half the population lives in poverty. This inequality fuels unaffordability, manifesting in high costs for housing, education, and utilities amid stagnant wages for the majority. Similarly, Brazil’s Gini of around 53-81 (depending on measures) reflects a legacy of concentrated land and capital ownership, where the top 10% capture nearly 60% of income. The result? Widespread cost-of-living crises, with urban favelas struggling against food and energy price hikes, exacerbating poverty rates that affect millions.
Latin America dominates such examples, with Colombia (Gini ~60), Chile (~60), and Mexico (~59) showing how elite capture perpetuates unaffordability. In Chile, a high-income economy with a Gini over 40, protests in 2019 highlighted how inequality amplifies the pain of rising transport and utility costs, leading to social unrest. Sub-Saharan Africa follows suit: Namibia’s Gini of 59-63 entrenches rural-urban divides, making basics like water and electricity unaffordable for the bottom quartile. Even in the United States, with a Gini of 41.1, the top 1% earn 40 times the bottom 90%, contributing to poverty rates of 12-18% and a growing affordability gap in housing and healthcare. These cases underscore that inflation’s true cost is not uniform; it is magnified by distributional inequities, turning modest price rises into existential threats for the vulnerable. The distributional effect of inflation and why it does not hurt everyone equally is illustrated in the following example:
Let us look at it from the point of view of Assets and Liabilities. Let us suppose that total assets are equal to $100, and total liabilities $20. Based on this point of view, Net Assets are equal to $80. Let us now assume a 5% inflation per year. This means that a) in real terms, the value of assets remains the same, and b) the debt is now 5% lower, so that: 5% of $20 is equal to $1; and Net Asset is $81 in real terms. But $1 is 1/80 = 1.25% or .0125. So, therefore, Assets rose by $1 or 1.25%. This is what economists call the Wealth Effect. Inflation almost always hurts the vulnerable and its true cost is not always uniform.
Reframing the debate around affordability demands policy pivots. Rather than obsessing over CPI targets, governments must prioritize supply-side reforms — investing in agricultural productivity, logistics, and infrastructure to stabilize food prices, as advocated in “The Reporter”. Expanding social safety nets, like Ethiopia’s Productive Safety Net Program, can cushion the poorest against shocks, addressing distributional flaws head-on. Progressive taxation, wage policies, and transparent currency management are equally vital to mitigate ERPT and rebuild trust. As I have emphasized, credibility is earned not through manipulated numbers but through actions that restore purchasing power and equity.
In summary, the inflation narrative must evolve from a governmental numbers game to a societal imperative centered on affordability and fair income distribution. Ethiopia’s crisis, as detailed in insightful analyses, serves as a cautionary tale: ignoring this linkage risks eroding the social contract. By embracing this reframing, policymakers can foster resilient economies where real growth, when it occurs, benefits all, not just the elite (with balance sheets). The dignity of daily survival — measured in the price of bread, not abstract percentages — must guide us forward.
Teshome Abebe, PH.D., a former Provost and Vice President for Academic Affair is Professor of Economics and Faculty Laureate.
Editor’s Note : Views in the article do not necessarily reflect the views of borkena.com
__
Support Borkena : https://borkena.com/subscribe-borkena/
Join our Telegram Channel : t.me/borkena
Like borkena on Facebook
Add your business to Ethiopian Business Listing / Ethiopian Business Directory Business Listing Toronto
Join the conversation. Follow us on X (Formerly Twitter) @zborkena to get the latest Ethiopian News updates regularly. Subscribe to YouTube channel To share information or for submission, send e-mail to [email protected]
Read more on Borkena Ethiopian News
