The Bank of Namibia has indicated that Namibia is moving closer to full PayPal functionality, with broader access expected from 2026.
For many Namibians, particularly freelancers, artists, consultants and small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs), this is more than a technical upgrade. It represents a meaningful shift in how international payments can be received, monitored and protected in an increasingly digital economy.
The timing is significant. rapid digitalisation has brought convenience and inclusion, but it has also exposed new vulnerabilities. In 2025 alone, reported banking-sector fraud losses exceeded N$65 million, according to the .
The Namibian police have confirmed that the majority of fraud cases recorded in recent years now involve digital channels rather than physical crime, while the (Cran) continues to warn the public about escalating online scams targeting ordinary users. These figures point to a clear reality: digital payments are here to stay, but risk management has not always kept pace.
How Namibians have been getting paid until now
Until now, many Namibians offering services to international clients had limited options. In practice, cryptocurrency often became the default alternative, not because it was ideal, but because it was accessible.
Crypto systems allow participation without a central authority. A wallet can be installed in minutes, often without identity verification at protocol level. While this openness has advantages, it also places the entire responsibility for security, compliance and fraud prevention on the individual user.
Globally, the consequences are well documented. was already stolen through crypto-related hacks and scams in the first half of 2025 alone, according to leading blockchain-analysis firms such as Chainalysis, and Elliptic, which regularly support regulators, law-enforcement agencies and financial institutions worldwide.
Losses are driven primarily by phishing, wallet compromise and decentralised-finance exploits — and they are typically irreversible.
Why changes the risk equation
was founded in 1998 and operates as a regulated financial intermediary across multiple jurisdictions. It requires identity verification, links transactions to monitored payment rails, and complies with know-your-customer and anti-money-laundering standards.
reports a global transaction-loss rate of approximately 0.07%, based on audited disclosures and monitored payment volumes. There is no comparable percentage for cryptocurrency. Because crypto operates without a central intermediary, fraud losses are reported as absolute figures rather than loss ratios.
Leading blockchain-analysis firms estimate that more than is lost globally each year through crypto-related hacks and scams, with losses typically irreversible and borne entirely by users.
The absence of a standardised loss metric reflects a deeper difference: crypto places responsibility for security almost entirely on the individual, whereas embeds fraud monitoring, identity checks and recovery mechanisms into the system itself.
How fraud typically occurs on each platform
Most -related fraud globally involves social engineering rather than platform failure. Phishing emails, fake invoices, impersonated support messages and account-takeover attempts exploit human behaviour, not weaknesses in ‘s infrastructure.
In most cases, the platform detects anomalies, flags suspicious activity or provides dispute and reporting mechanisms once an incident is identified. Awareness, therefore, remains the strongest defence.
Crypto-related losses follow a different pattern. While social engineering also plays a role, a significant proportion of losses arise from wallet compromises, phishing that targets private keys or seed phrases, malicious smart contracts and decentralised-finance exploits.
Once crypto assets are transferred, transactions are typically irreversible, and there is no central authority to freeze funds or mediate recovery. As a result, losses are borne almost entirely by the user, even when deception, rather than intent, caused the transfer.
Why this matters for
‘s arrival does not eliminate fraud, but it changes how risk is managed. It introduces a mature payment option with accountability, dispute pathways and institutional oversight, features that have largely been absent for Namibian users receiving international payments.
For SMEs and creatives, this reduces reliance on high-risk alternatives. For regulators and banks, it aligns with broader efforts to modernise payment infrastructure while strengthening consumer protection. For users, it provides a system where mistakes are less likely to become permanent losses.
Verify payments within the platform rather than relying on screenshots
Treat urgent or unsolicited account messages with caution
Secure email accounts linked to payment platforms
Separate payment handling from service delivery where possible
Fraud prevention is most effective when system safeguards and user awareness work together.
Looking ahead
digital-payments landscape is evolving. The move toward access in 2026 is not about replacing one system with another, but about introducing a safer, more accountable option into a high-risk environment.
Digital progress becomes sustainable when access is paired with protection. In that sense, is not just a convenience — it is a step forward in building trust in digital economy.
In an age of information overload, Sunrise is The Namibian’s morning briefing, delivered at 6h00 from Monday to Friday. It offers a curated rundown of the most important stories from the past 24 hours – occasionally with a light, witty touch. It’s an essential way to stay informed. Subscribe and join our newsletter community.
The Namibian uses AI tools to assist with improved quality, accuracy and efficiency, while maintaining editorial oversight and journalistic integrity.
Copyright 2025 The Namibian. All rights reserved. Distributed by AllAfrica Global Media (allAfrica.com)., source
