Forbes contributors publish independent expert analyses and insights.
For a long time, music festivals have been treated as temporary moments. Tickets are sold. Stages go up. Crowds arrive. And once the final set ends, the connection between organizers, artists, and attendees mostly fades away. In many cases, the digital footprint of an event disappears almost as quickly as the physical one.
When placed next to the size of the industry itself, this becomes more striking. The global live events market was valued at around $650 billion in 2022, and analysts expect it to move toward the trillion-dollar range over the next decade. In-person experiences are not shrinking. They are growing. Yet the digital systems supporting many festivals still feel fragmented and short-lived.
As festivals expand across cities and continents, the limits of the traditional model are becoming harder to ignore. One-off apps and disconnected tools struggle to support audiences before arrival, during the event, and after they return home. What once worked for a weekend no longer scales cleanly for global operations. It has also sparked a new wave of festival technology, each promising to solve parts of the problem.
Large festivals may last only a few days, but the systems behind them are under pressure year-round. Managing identity, access and participation through different apps and one-off tools quickly breaks down, especially as people move between cities.
Some platforms have already begun addressing this problem at the application layer. Tools such as Luma bring conferences, side events and ticketing into a single interface, helping users navigate fragmented event schedules more easily.
There is no shortage of Web2 systems already tackling parts of this challenge. Tools such as PassKit integrate event tickets and memberships directly into Apple and Google Wallet, streamlining how access is stored and presented. Platforms like Oveit combine ticketing with NFC-based cashless payments and loyalty programs through wristbands and badges.
Large organizers have also built their own stacks, such as Ultra Music Festival’s “Ultra Passport,” which ties attendance history, perks and early-access benefits into a global CRM-style program.
These systems solve important problems at the application layer. What they share, however, is a reliance on platform-specific wallets, centralized user accounts or proprietary databases. In this model, the identifier lives in the user’s own wallet, so their access rights and participation history survive even when vendors, ticketing stacks or regions do not.
What Zamna, a global electronic music festival series, is exploring is a different layer of the problem. Instead of relying on platform-specific wallets or proprietary databases, its system is designed around decentralized identifiers that stay with the user rather than inside a single company’s infrastructure. The distinction is subtle but important. While pass-based tools optimise how access is displayed, an infrastructure-layer model focuses on how identity, participation and access persist across platforms, locations and seasons.
The real difference only becomes visible when platforms, vendors or regions change. At these events, that continuity lives inside a wallet-based identity layer, where identity and balance are preserved even as payment terminals, cities and festival operators change. The model does not depend on Apple Wallet, NFC wristbands or any single ticketing provider.
In a typical Web2 setup, changing providers often means starting over. In this model, the same decentralized identifier continues to work regardless of the system in place.
That distinction becomes clearer as festivals begin to rethink how technology fits into the experience and treat it as part of the underlying infrastructure.
The organizers began working with Web3 infrastructure partners to bring digital wallets and purpose-built tokens into the core of how the festival operates rather than leaving them as an added feature.
Through what Zamna calls a “festival hub,” identity, access and participation are designed to persist across locations and seasons instead of resetting with each event. Rather than moving between separate apps for tickets and entry, attendees interact through a single digital layer that runs quietly in the background.
Payments follow the same logic. Attendees can fund their wallets using stable digital assets such as USDT, which are converted behind the scenes into the festival’s native token layer and local event points.
In practice, this does not require every booth or food stall to run complex blockchain systems. Vendors use a lightweight payment terminal app installed on standard smartphones, while attendees interact through the official wallet by scanning QR codes at entry points, merchandise stands or food stalls. In the background, a decentralized identifier linked to the user’s wallet is verified, allowing identity and access rights to be recognized without relying on a central database.
To support this model, the project introduced a non-custodial wallet layer and a token-based participation system, implemented through FG Wallet 2.0 and REDX. The wallet layer carries identity and access across locations, reducing the number of repeated steps users face as they move between events. The token layer supports participation inside the festival environment through peer-to-peer and card-linked features, helping different parts of the experience connect without adding friction.
For attendees, the most noticeable change is not the presence of new technology, but what stays with them after the event. Identity, attendance and participation no longer disappear once the weekend ends. Instead, parts of the experience can carry forward, changing how fans stay in touch with artists and the festival over time.
One practical example is how attendance can be reflected digitally. Zamna, which has more than one million registered online members, allows users to collect NFTs linked to their participation, giving parts of the experience a life beyond the physical event. Instead of being locked inside a ticketing app, those records remain part of the user’s digital identity across events.
What stands out is how little adjustment this kind of system asks from users. Most attendees are not interacting with new tools so much as noticing what no longer gets in the way: fewer repeated steps, clearer access and a smoother experience as festivals move between locations.
That pattern reflects a broader direction for Web3 in established industries. Rather than trying to replace existing systems, the technology is starting to settle into operational roles, reinforcing how identity, access and continuity work under real-world conditions.
In live events, Web3 will only succeed if it works quietly enough that most people never notice it.
