RLUSD’s expansion began after its December 2024 launch, as early exchange listings built baseline circulation and pushed the market cap beyond $1 billion. Subsequently, Binance’s January 2026 listing marked a structural liquidity inflection, expanding access through global distribution and zero-fee trading incentives.
Trading volumes and exchange reserves then climbed as custodial deposits seeded supply. Shortly after, withdrawal activation enabled on-chain migration. On 12 February, XRPL integration opened deposit rails while liquidity matured.
Consequently, Binance strengthened stablecoin market share, while the XRP Ledger gained settlement depth.
Together, these developments are advancing RLUSD’s cross-border payment utility and multi-network circulation.
Supply expansion extended the earlier exchange-driven momentum, as RLUSD’s circulation climbed to roughly $1.52 billion by mid-February 2026. This growth was propelled by Binance onboarding, institutional inflows, and payment corridor seeding.
Issuance scaled through treasury mints of 59 million, 28.2 million, and 35 million, routing liquidity into exchanges and DeFi rails as demand intensified.
Alongside this expansion, measured burns — such as 2.5 million on Ethereum [ETH] — tempered oversupply – Reinforcing peg stability above 103% collateralization.
Chain allocation then clarified deployment intent. Ethereum absorbed nearly $1.2 billion, or 77-79%, driven by liquidity provisioning and collateral utility. XRPL held about $348 million, or 22-23%, reflecting settlement routing.
As XRPL deposits opened, cross-border throughput improved. This dual expansion deepened exchange liquidity, strengthened DeFi rails, and advanced payment infrastructure across both ecosystems.
RLUSD’s circulation scaled to roughly $1.52 billion by mid-February 2026, remaining small compared to Tether’s [USDT] $185 billion dominance. However, on-chain behavior began diverging early. Transfer activity accelerated, with about $6.3 billion moving monthly.
On the contrary, USDT processed far larger absolute flows but showed lower per-unit velocity due to its vast circulating base. Much of USDT’s liquidity has been parked across exchanges, derivatives venues, and DeFi collateral pools. RLUSD flows, meanwhile, rotated more actively through settlement corridors.
Chain distribution reinforced this split. Ethereum balances leaned towards liquidity provisioning, while XRPL allocations processed faster payment routing. Exchange reserves also thinned faster relative to supply, signaling migration towards utility endpoints.
Finally, institutional treasury settlements and cross-border transfers have driven a larger share of movement. Sucb a comparison frames RLUSD less as a trading stablecoin and more as a settlement-optimized instrument. One operating alongside USDT’s market-dominant liquidity role.
