As 2025 draws to a close, investor attention is converging around two big questions: how quickly Washington will deliver a comprehensive regulatory framework for digital assets, and whether advances in quantum computing pose an imminent threat to blockchain security, crypto asset manager Grayscale said in a Monday report.
In Grayscale’s view, one of these debates is likely to reshape markets in the near term, while the other may prove more of a distraction than a driver.
The firm’s analysts expect a bipartisan crypto market structure bill to become law in 2026, marking a milestone for the asset class.
While negotiations remain over key details, the analysts said the broad direction is clear: Lawmakers are moving toward a traditional financial-market rulebook for crypto, covering registration and disclosure requirements, clearer classifications of digital assets and guardrails for insiders.
A more complete and harmonized regulatory framework in the U.S., and potentially across other major economies, could have practical consequences for adoption.
Regulated financial services firms may become more comfortable holding digital assets on their balance sheets, while increased legal clarity could encourage institutions to transact directly on blockchains. The report argued that such developments would mark the early stages of a more institutional era for crypto markets.
In contrast, the analysts see concerns about quantum computing as a legitimate but overstated theme heading into 2026.
The firm expects the topic to generate headlines and debate, but says it is unlikely to materially influence asset prices in the near term. Grayscale acknowledged that, in theory, sufficiently powerful quantum computers could undermine today’s cryptographic standards by deriving private keys from public ones, potentially enabling fraudulent transactions.
Over the long run, Grayscale says most blockchains, including Bitcoin, along with much of the broader digital economy, will need to upgrade to post-quantum cryptography. However, the firm believes those risks remain distant for now. While markets may eventually assess blockchains based on how prepared they are to address the quantum challenge, this will not meaningfully affect valuations next year.
