Policy change aligns with broader U.S. regulatory shifts in digital assets.
On December 18th, the Federal Reserve announced the withdrawal of its restrictive 2023 policy on state member banks’ crypto activities, replacing it with a flexible framework effective 2025.
This shift indicates evolving U.S. regulations towards crypto, offering banks more opportunities to integrate digital assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum, potentially impacting market dynamics.
This signals a potential increase in integration of assets like Bitcoin, Ethereum, and stablecoins into bank operations, observing the respective risk criteria.
Market reactions underscore optimism toward this regulatory shift. Although direct commentary from crypto industry leaders is sparse, the institutional response indicates a cautious welcome. Regulatory bodies like the OCC have previously allowed national banks to hold digital assets.
“New technologies offer efficiencies to banks and improved products and services to bank customers. By creating a pathway for responsible, innovative products and services, the Board is helping ensure that the banking sector remains safe and sound while also modern, efficient, and effective.”
Did you know? In 2023, the Federal Reserve’s restrictive policy effectively curbed state banks’ abilities to integrate digital assets on their balance sheets, a move now being reversed with the 2025 guidelines.
According to CoinMarketCap, Bitcoin (BTC) currently trades at $86,072.75 with a market cap of $1.72 trillion and holds a market dominance of 59.15%. Recent price movements show a 24-hour decrease of 1.79%, reflecting broader market trends. As of the last update on December 18, 2025, the 24-hour trading volume reached $43.68 billion, marking a 5.69% change.
Coincu research highlights that this policy adjustment may lead to increased adoption of digital assets in traditional banking frameworks. With evolving regulatory landscapes, banks could transition towards more integrated blockchain solutions, aligning with global shifts. The policy’s long-term impacts hinge on risk management implementations and external market developments such as those noted in the Federal Reserve’s lessons from the Silicon Valley Bank failure.
