The Enforcement Directorate has charged Raj Kundra, alleging he is a beneficial owner of 285 Bitcoins valued at ₹150.47 crore. The chargesheet claims Kundra concealed evidence and misrepresented his role in transactions linked to Amit Bhardwaj’s crypto-scam.
The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has filed a chargesheet against actress Shilpa Shetty’s husband Raj Kundra, for alleged involvement in a Bitcoin ‘scam’, according to a PTI report.
The investigative agency has claimed that Kundra was a benficial owner in the operations, and not just a mediator for transactions, as claimed by him, it added.
The ED claimed that Kundra deliberately concealed crucial evidence, including the Bitcoin wallet addresses, and failed to surrender the Bitcoins received from Bhardwaj.
The probe agency contended that Kundra continued to be in possession and enjoyment of the said proceeds of crime (Bitcoins).
Further, the ED said he did a “genuine transaction” with his actor wife Shilpa Shetty at “far below market rate” to disguise the origin of such funds obtained by commission of criminal activities.
Thus, he tried to frustrate the proceeding under PMLA by layering the proceeds of crime and projected the same as untainted, the ED claimed in the chargesheet.
As per the ED, Bitcoins were supposed to be utilised for mining and investors were supposed to get huge returns in crypto assets, but the promoters “cheated” them and have been concealing the “ill-gotten” Bitcoins in obscure online wallets.
Kundra, the agency alleged, received 285 Bitcoins from the “mastermind” and promoter of Gain Bitcoin Ponzi “scam” Amit Bhardwaj for setting up a Bitcoin mining farm in Ukraine. Since the deal did not materialise, Kundra is still in possession of 285 Bitcoins presently valued at more than ₹150 crore, the ED claimed.
“Thus, it can be safely concluded that the agreement was actually between Raj Kundra and Amit Bhardwaj (his father Mahender Bhardwaj) and the argument given by Kundra that he acted as a mere mediator is not tenable,” the chargesheet said.
The fact that Kundra remembers the exact number of Bitcoins received in five specific tranches for more than seven years since the transactions took place “solidifies the fact that he was indeed the recipient of Bitcoins as a beneficial owner and not acted merely as a mediator”, the chargesheet said.
Despite multiple opportunities since 2018, Kundra has consistently failed to provide the wallet addresses where the 285 Bitcoins were transferred, the complaint said.
He cited damage to his iPhone X soon after his initial statement as the reason for the missing information, which the ED viewed as a deliberate attempt to destroy evidence and conceal the proceeds of crime. Besides Kundra, the other person named in the chargesheet is businessman Rajesh Satija.
