As the crypto race in Southeast Asia heats up by the day, Vietnam – a nation with 17 million crypto users – unexpectedly enters the arena with Resolution 05/2025.
Each Southeast Asian country has its own strategy: some open their doors completely, while others tighten control. So in this diverse regulatory landscape, where is Vietnam positioning itself and what makes their strategy different?
Let’s explore through the perspective of Van Hieu – Researcher at 5 Phút Crypto, Vietnam’s leading crypto community with hundreds of thousands of members directly impacted by these new regulations.
On September 9, 2025, the Vietnamese government unexpectedly announced Resolution 05 on piloting crypto management for the next five years. This is a strong signal that Vietnam is serious about becoming a major player in the global crypto race.
According to Chainalysis, as of August 2025, Vietnam has approximately 17 million crypto holders, ranking 4th globally in crypto adoption rates and leading Southeast Asia. Each year, Vietnamese trade crypto worth over $100 billion USD, a massive figure but mostly occurring in a legal gray area.
Resolution 05 was created to address exactly this issue. Instead of imposing bans, the government chose to bring all crypto activities under a clear legal framework. This means everything from buying and selling Bitcoin and Ethereum to issuing new tokens will be strictly managed under specific regulations.
The question is whether this model will succeed? With a young, tech-savvy population hungry for investment opportunities, does Vietnam’s crypto industry have what it takes to lead Southeast Asia?
According to representatives from 5 Phút Crypto, looking at Southeast Asia’s crypto landscape, each country is playing a different game:
Vietnam: Strict Pilot Program
Vietnam’s Resolution 05 establishes the first legal framework for crypto assets, with a 5-year pilot program starting September 2025.
However, there’s a major loophole that Bui Dai Huynh (former Legal Director at Sky Mavis) points out: The Resolution doesn’t clearly distinguish between exchange trading (off-chain) and direct blockchain transactions (on-chain). If activities like staking or farming also require licenses, it would be disastrous for blockchain technology development in Vietnam.
Thailand: Open Doors to the World
Thailand stands out with its open approach, with the SEC actively promoting Bitcoin ETFs, potentially becoming the region’s first country to launch this product. The country even allows tourists to exchange crypto for baht for convenient spending.
With an adoption rate of about 10-12% (Bloomberg, September 2025), lower than Vietnam, Thailand has a major advantage with international exchanges like Upbit operating legally. Investors have more choices, better liquidity, and most importantly – no discrimination between domestic and foreign token purchases.
But freedom comes at a price. Thailand’s market has witnessed numerous pump-dump schemes due to lax controls. This is exactly the lesson Vietnam is trying to avoid.
Singapore applies the strictest regulations through the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), requiring Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) to meet stringent anti-money laundering and security standards.
According to Chainalysis (2025), Singapore’s crypto adoption rate is around 8-10%, focusing more on institutions than individuals. Unlike Vietnam, Singapore doesn’t limit token buyers and encourages global exchanges like Coinbase, creating a competitive environment.
However, high compliance costs make this market difficult for small projects to access, contrasting with Vietnam’s FDI attraction goals.
Since 2019, Indonesia has completely banned ICO (Initial Coin Offering) issuances. But simultaneously, it allows citizens to freely trade Bitcoin, Ethereum and hundreds of other coins.
Therefore, with 8-9% population participation, Indonesia’s market is quite active in trading, but virtually no blockchain projects originate from this country.
An interesting point is Indonesia’s integration of crypto with Islamic finance. Exchanges must prove their operations comply with Sharia law – no interest lending, no excessive speculation. Exchange establishment doesn’t require massive capital like Vietnam, but tightens daily transaction reporting to prevent money laundering.
Compared to Vietnam, Indonesia chose a safe path but also limited itself. While Vietnam wants to both control and develop domestic blockchain technology, Indonesia simply wants citizens to participate in the global crypto market without risks from domestic projects.
Philippines: Remittance Paradise, Scam Hell
The Philippines is a cautionary tale about being too lax in crypto management. With 10% of the population participating in crypto for one main purpose: remittances.
Millions of Filipino workers abroad send money home via crypto because it’s cheaper and faster than Western Union. A domestic helper in Hong Kong can send Bitcoin home in minutes with fees under 1%, instead of 5-7% through traditional channels. The Central Bank (BSP) saw this benefit and facilitated easy exchange operations.
But the price was steep. The Philippines became fertile ground for crypto scams and flourishing Ponzi schemes.
This is exactly the lesson Vietnam is trying to avoid. Resolution 05’s capital barriers may frustrate many, but at least they eliminate scammers who can’t afford to play. The Philippines shows that an overly free market can harm its own citizens.
With Southeast Asia’s highest crypto adoption rate and newly issued Resolution 05, Vietnam is at a crucial moment to shape the region’s crypto future.
Looking at neighboring countries, Vietnam is playing a different game:
Vietnam learned from all these lessons and chose a balanced path – not too loose like the Philippines, not too tight like Singapore. But this is just the beginning on paper.
The real challenge lies in implementation over the next six months. If the Government doesn’t issue detailed guidance in time, or inadvertently over-restricts on-chain activities (like staking, farming on personal wallets), this entire plan could backfire. Instead of attracting investors, Vietnam could push its current 17 million crypto users into a difficult position.
