Crypto payments are not allowed by UK-licensed betting operators
UK-licensed operators in Great Britain cannot accept cryptocurrencies for betting payments under the current regime. According to a UK Parliament written answer on 5 May 2025, doing so would breach existing requirements around payments, anti‑money laundering, and consumer protection.
The same parliamentary record indicates any future use of crypto would first require the operator to satisfy the Commission’s AML and social-responsibility rules and to notify the regulator, potentially via licence changes. That position remains the operative baseline for UK crypto betting regulations.
Regulators are examining whether, and under what controls, crypto could be brought inside the licensed market to reduce risks migrating to unregulated channels. As reported by Bloomberg, the gambling watchdog “plans to explore permitting gamblers to pay for their bets with cryptocurrencies.”
Editorially, that exploration reflects mounting policy pressure to reconcile innovation with crime-prevention and safer-gambling duties. InterGame Online has reported remarks from the Commission’s chief executive highlighting compressed timelines and significant hurdles around AML, traceability, and source-of-wealth verification.
A compliance-first path would require operators to rebuild payments due diligence from onboarding to withdrawals. That includes enhanced KYC, consistent source-of-wealth testing for crypto-derived funds, blockchain analytics for provenance, and transaction monitoring calibrated to wallet and exchange risk typologies.
Firms would also need to update financial-crime risk assessments, staff training, and record-keeping; implement friction at deposit thresholds; and prove social-responsibility controls work equivalently for crypto deposits. Licence notifications or variations would be expected where payment methods or risk controls materially change.
Based on materials from the Financial Conduct Authority, a stablecoin sandbox is targeted around early 2026 to test regulated payment use cases. Its standards for issuance, custody, disclosures, and redemptions could shape how gambling payments intersect with financial regulation.
Effective coordination is likely to hinge on avoiding duplicative oversight: financial resilience and conduct under the sandbox, with gambling-specific AML and safer-gambling obligations enforced by the relevant licensing authority. Operators evaluating crypto rails should map wallet due diligence to any sandbox payment-system requirements.
Great Britain licensing covers England, Scotland, and Wales, and does not extend to Northern Ireland. Any movement on UK Gambling Commission crypto payments would therefore apply to that Great Britain scope unless separate arrangements are adopted elsewhere.
At the time of this writing, Bitcoin trades near $66,112 with elevated short-term volatility, providing context for deposit-value swings and affordability checks. Market figures are background only and do not indicate regulatory outcomes.
Enhanced KYC, wallet provenance checks using blockchain analytics, consistent source-of-wealth validation for crypto-derived funds, calibrated transaction monitoring, and refreshed financial-crime risk assessments aligned to crypto risks.
If payment stablecoins meet sandbox standards on issuance, custody, and redemption, operators could face clearer fiat-on-chain equivalence, while still meeting gambling AML and safer-gambling obligations.
