U.S. Senators Elizabeth Warren and Andy Kim urged Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent to review a reported foreign investment in World Liberty Financial last week. The request followed disclosures that a United Arab Emirates-backed vehicle agreed to purchase a 49% stake in the Trump-linked crypto firm for roughly $500 million. Lawmakers cited national security risks and potential exposure of sensitive financial data.
The development added a new political layer to Crypto News coverage around Trump-linked ventures and foreign capital flows. Crypto News has increasingly intersected with national security oversight as digital asset platforms handle financial and personal information at scale. Lawmakers framed the investment as a test of whether existing review mechanisms adequately address crypto-related foreign influence.
In a letter sent Friday, Warren and Kim asked Bessent, who chairs the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, to confirm whether the panel had been notified of the transaction. They requested a comprehensive review if notification had not occurred. The senators wrote that the reported agreement took place days before President Donald Trump’s inauguration and would make the foreign fund the firm’s largest outside shareholder.
The letter stated that the investment was reportedly backed by Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed Al Nahyan, the United Arab Emirates’ national security adviser. It alleged that about $187 million flowed to entities linked to the Trump family. The arrangement also granted two board seats to executives connected to G42, a technology company that U.S. intelligence agencies previously scrutinized over concerns about ties to China.
CFIUS reviews foreign investments that may provide access to sensitive technologies or personal data. Warren and Kim argued that the structure of the deal could allow a foreign government to influence a U.S. company handling financial information. They asked Bessent to respond by March 5 with details on any review steps.
The senators cited the firm’s privacy disclosures to support their concerns. They wrote that World Liberty Financial collected wallet addresses, Internet Protocol addresses, device identifiers, and approximate location data. The company also gathered certain identity records through service providers, which they argued could increase exposure risk.
In prior correspondence from November, Warren and Senator Jack Reed urged authorities to investigate alleged links between World Liberty Financial’s token sales and sanctioned foreign actors. That letter referenced claims that governance tokens were purchased by blockchain addresses tied to North Korea’s Lazarus Group, as well as entities linked to Russia and Iran. The latest appeal expanded that scrutiny to equity ownership and board control.
Crypto News has increasingly featured similar questions about how token platforms manage cross-border capital. Lawmakers framed this case as distinct because of the reported ownership percentage and governance rights. They argued that board representation could amplify foreign access to internal strategy and user data policies.
Speaking to reporters earlier this month, President Donald Trump said he was unaware of the reported investment tied to an Abu Dhabi royal. He stated that he had no direct role in the deal and that his sons managed the matter. Trump added that his family handled investments from various parties.
That response attempted to separate presidential duties from family business interests. However, the senators focused on the timing of the agreement relative to the inauguration. They suggested that proximity to a transition period could warrant deeper scrutiny.
Crypto News has repeatedly shown how political affiliations intersect with digital asset ventures. This case combined foreign sovereign-linked capital, governance rights, and a firm tied to a sitting president’s family. Lawmakers positioned the issue as one of oversight rather than market performance.
Treasury now faced pressure to clarify whether CFIUS received formal notification of the transaction. If the committee initiated a review, it would likely assess governance rights, data access pathways, and capital flow structures. The next public milestone would be the requested response deadline of March 5, which could determine whether the investigation proceeds.
Read more on The Coin Republic
