Crypto venture capital funds are confronting an identity crisis.
Plummeting digital-asset prices and a wave of market consolidations are exposing the fragility of an industry that boomed on speculation but has struggled to build sustainable, revenue-generating businesses.
Retail traders have continued to drift away from digital art and memecoins, while token prices have crashed — a casualty of the rug pulls and day-trader blowups that followed last year’s market crash. Now crypto VCs are being pulled toward a more traditional startup playbook: product-market fit, monetization, and long-term user retention.
The pressure is mounting as the broader market sours. Bitcoin plunged anew last week to erase nearly 50% from October’s record high, before rebounding. Altcoins have fared worse: one guage tracking smaller tokens is down as much as 70% year over year. Despite a crypto-friendly White House and permissive regulation, retail demand — once the flywheel for token-driven VC logic — has cratered.
Crypto-native funds are gravitating toward better-performing corners of the market, including stablecoin infrastructure and on-chain prediction markets, while some are also expanding into adjacent sectors like fintech and AI. But with traditional firms gaining ground, crypto-native expertise is no longer enough.
“The market is consolidating around what’s actually working,” said Santiago Roel Santos, founder and chief executive officer of crypto private equity firm Inversion. “Web3 as a category is largely uninvestable for now. People have moved on from NFTs, gaming, and the next incremental DeFi platform built for its own sake. Even crypto-native VCs with dry powder are pivoting hard toward fintech and stablecoin plays, and prediction markets. Everything else is struggling to get attention.”
Crypto-native funds like Mechanism Capital and Tangent have begun shifting their focus toward deep tech — including investing in robotic startups like Apptronik and Figure — a sign of how far the center of gravity has moved from crypto’s core. Multicoin Capital, a prominent investment firm, said last week that co-founder Kyle Samani was stepping back to pursue interests in areas like AI, longevity, and robotics.
All of this is happening despite a decent fundraising year, with venture firms pouring $18.9 billion into crypto startups in 2025, according to data compiled by Blockworks, though that’s below the speculative highs of 2021 and 2022. That figure also excludes investment in digital-asset treasuries, an experiment that has misfired — draining both capital and momentum from the broader industry. Nearly a third of 2025 VC total went to just four deals, including Binance and Polymarket, underscoring how concentrated last year’s capital deployment really was.
By late summer, the retreat had accelerated. Funds were stepping back from high-risk bets on nonfungible tokens, Web3 social platforms, and blockchain-powered gaming — speculative narratives that defined earlier cycles. Galaxy Digital flagged the trend in its fourth-quarter report on crypto and blockchain venture capital, noting a continued move away from earlier-cycle narratives.
The number of mergers and acquisitions peaked in October at 22. As 2026 began, signs of consolidation mounted. Social media platform Farcaster said it plans to return capital to investors. Gemini Space Station announced that it was shutting down its NFT marketplace Nifty Gateway. Rodeo, another NFT platform, also said it was gradually closing.
The metrics now in focus — revenue, retention, and willingness to pay — often took a back seat in earlier cycles, when narrative buzz, token liquidity, and market share acted as stand-ins for traction. That’s led some crypto-native VCs to expand into fintech or AI, according to Portal Ventures general partner Catrina Wang.
“That can work for some, but it begs an honest question of ‘what’s the right to win outside of core?'” she said. “We’ve seen tourists lose in our industry – the same will be true for firms that expand without a right to win.”
Get the Bloomberg Crypto newsletter.
Get the Bloomberg Crypto newsletter.
Get the Bloomberg Crypto newsletter.
The essential read on the crypto universe delivered straight to your inbox twice a week.
The essential read on the crypto universe delivered straight to your inbox twice a week.
The essential read on the crypto universe delivered straight to your inbox twice a week.
Bloomberg may send me offers and promotions.
Plus Signed UpPlus Sign UpPlus Sign Up
By submitting my information, I agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.
At the same time, some crypto-native funds are finding themselves squeezed out of the few crypto sectors still attracting capital — like prediction markets and stablecoins — as traditional fintech and generalist firms move in. That shift threatens to erode what was once the core value proposition of crypto-native venture funds: early access to token deals and fluency in market mechanics, from incentive design to protocol governance, that once gave them an edge over traditional investors. But as digital assets become increasingly intertwined with Wall Street, that edge is no longer guaranteed.
“I would not be surprised if we continue to see funds quietly close or downsize,” said Tom Schmidt, general partner at venture fund Dragonfly. “They’re also facing increased competition for the hottest deals in the web 2.5 space from traditional VCs.”
Game Changer
For many crypto startups, the funding environment has fundamentally changed. Projects without a clear product, or a path to revenue, are struggling to raise capital. The days when a compelling story alone could attract millions are largely over. With token sales no longer a reliable financing tool, many teams are facing uncertain futures.
“That’s the unfortunate reality of capital allocation,” said Roel Santos. “It doesn’t mean neglected categories don’t work, they just get underfunded because capital flows in waves, swinging from extreme optimism to extreme pessimism.”
Even so, some venture investors point to successes like crypto exchange Hyperliquid and memecoin platform Pump.fun, both of which pair high-volume speculation with strong user traction. They’re reminders that product-market fit and sustainable revenue can still exist in crypto, especially in segments where speculation itself remains the product.
Unlike earlier cycles, when both founders and investors were still testing what worked, there’s now far less tolerance for projects without clear paths to monetization.
“Generating revenue and becoming ‘default alive’ is pretty advantageous in a market where venture dollars are more expensive or harder to come by,” said Schmidt. “For projects that do want to pursue venture financing, revenue generation and proving willingness to pay are the ultimate indicators of PMF for VCs.”
Read more on Bloomberg Business
