Amin Ayan is a crypto journalist with over four years of experience in the industry. He has contributed to leading publications such as Cryptonews, Investing.com, 99Bitcoins, and 24/7 Wall St. He has…
Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong has rejected reports that tensions with the White House could derail the CLARITY Act, pushing back against claims that the administration is preparing to withdraw its support for the crypto market structure bill.
In a recent post on X, Armstrong said the White House has remained engaged and constructive despite recent disagreements over the legislation’s direction.
He noted that administration officials had encouraged Coinbase to explore potential compromises with banks, discussions he said are still ongoing.
Armstrong Pushes Back on White House Clash Claims
“The White House has been super constructive here,” Armstrong wrote on X, dismissing speculation of a breakdown in relations.
The comments followed a report from journalist Eleanor Terrett alleging a clash between Coinbase and the administration of Donald Trump, suggesting officials were unhappy with Coinbase’s decision to step back from the bill.
Coinbase withdrew its support earlier this week, arguing that the latest draft of the CLARITY Act could undermine decentralized finance, restrict tokenized stock trading, and block firms from sharing stablecoin yield with users.
Armstrong said the exchange would rather see the bill delayed than passed in its current form.
He described several provisions as harmful to consumers and innovation, calling the draft “catastrophic” while expressing hope that lawmakers and the industry can reach a more workable compromise.
Coinbase has circulated a list of objections to the most recent version of the bill, focusing on its impact on DeFi and stablecoin-based products.
Those concerns prompted the US Senate Banking Committee to postpone a planned markup of the CLARITY Act, giving lawmakers additional time to negotiate changes with industry participants.
Armstrong said he expects a revised version of the bill to return for consideration within the next few weeks.
The debate has exposed rifts within the crypto sector itself. Some executives argue the CLARITY Act would provide long-sought regulatory clarity, even with compromises, while others see it as a concession to traditional banking interests.
The sharpest divide centers on stablecoin yield, with critics warning that banning revenue sharing could stifle competition and limit consumer choice.
Crypto Regulation Turns Political
The past week underscored how crypto regulation has moved beyond technical rulemaking into a broader political struggle over institutional independence, enforcement power, and surveillance authority.
From central bank pressure to legislative gridlock, the policy environment around digital assets remains unstable and increasingly shaped by political dynamics.
That tension came into sharp focus after Jerome Powell publicly warned that a Justice Department probe tied to his congressional testimony risked undermining the independence of the Federal Reserve.
Meanwhile, momentum on federal crypto legislation slowed as the US Senate Agriculture Committee delayed markup of the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act amid unresolved disputes over DeFi, stablecoin yield, and regulatory jurisdiction.
Concerns deepened after Galaxy Digital warned that a Senate Banking draft could grant the Treasury sweeping “Patriot Act-style” powers, raising fears that aggressive surveillance authorities could chill innovation and push crypto activity offshore.
