Compromise proposals like Alsobrooks would limit yields to staked stablecoins, not passive holdings.
The Clarity Act continues to face significant delays despite bipartisan support, with the primary obstacle now clearly identified.
Traditional banking institutions are actively blocking legislation that would allow stablecoin holders to earn yields on their digital dollar holdings.
Industry analyst MartyParty revealed the underlying dynamics in a detailed post, explaining how banking lobbyists have stalled crypto legislation to protect their business model.
The core issue centers on stablecoins backed by US Treasuries generating 3-5% returns while bank accounts offer zero interest to depositors.
The fundamental reason for the Clarity Act’s delay lies in banking industry self-preservation. Banks currently hold trillions in customer checking accounts that earn nothing for depositors.
These zero-yield deposits form a critical profit center for traditional financial institutions. Allowing stablecoin holders to earn Treasury-backed yields would trigger catastrophic deposit flight.
MartyParty explained that blockchain technology directly threatens bank existence by eliminating intermediary requirements. The same banking lobby that orchestrated Operation Choke Point now wages war against crypto legislation.
Their resistance stems from recognition that consumers would rationally abandon zero-yield accounts for 3-5% stablecoin returns.
This deposit flight scenario represents the banking sector’s worst nightmare. Trillions would drain from traditional accounts into crypto wallets virtually overnight.
Banks understand they cannot compete with Treasury-backed yields while offering nothing to checking account holders. The Clarity Act remains stalled because banking lobbyists refuse to accept their own obsolescence.
Recent weekend meetings generated compromise proposals attempting to break the legislative deadlock. The Alsobrooks Proposal distinguishes between passive and active stablecoin holdings as a potential middle ground.
Under this framework, only “staked” or non-passive stablecoins would qualify for yield generation.
MartyParty characterized these compromises as desperate banking industry survival tactics rather than good-faith negotiations.
Financial institutions continue fighting aggressively to limit any yield-earning mechanisms for digital dollar holders. Their lobbying efforts target the specific provisions that would unlock stablecoin adoption at scale.
The delayed legislation would otherwise revolutionize financial transactions and strengthen dollar reserve currency status.
Stablecoins represent digital US debt that could boost GDP and lower inflation through increased efficiency. However, the Market Structure and Clarity laws remain blocked because banks prioritize short-term survival over long-term economic benefits.
Banking lobbyists maintain their stranglehold on Congressional progress, explaining why transformative bipartisan legislation cannot advance despite widespread support for cryptocurrency integration.
