The CryptoNews editorial team is composed of seasoned writers specializing in cryptocurrency and blockchain technology. Their expertise ensures comprehensive, accurate, and insightful content for…
ZachXBT just uncovered what looks like a coordinated insider trading ring at Axiom crypto. According to his findings, senior employees used internal data tools to front-run user trades for more than 10 months, allegedly pocketing over $400,000 in the process. The method involved privileged back-end access that allowed staff to track and mirror high-value wallets before the broader market reacted.
This points to deeper governance failures at a platform generating roughly $390 million in annual revenue. Non-technical staff reportedly had unrestricted access to live user identifiers, exposing a serious breakdown in internal controls.
How the Insider Trading Scheme Operated Inside Axiom Crypto
The scheme was simple and effective. Investigators say employees used internal admin dashboards meant for support and compliance to pull private user data. By linking User IDs to on-chain wallets, they could identify high-profile traders and institutions behind supposedly anonymous addresses.
From there, the play was straightforward. Monitor activity, then trade ahead of it. Buy before a large wallet pushed price. Sell before a whale exits. It was front-running their own users.
The activity reportedly lasted at least 10 months. The troubling part is that business development staff had the same level of system access as technical security teams. That breakdown in internal controls created the information asymmetry that made the scheme possible.
Discover: The best crypto to diversify your portfolio with
$390M Revenue vs. Zero Access Controls: What Is Axiom Team Response?
Axiom generated $390 million in revenue and scaled rapidly, but the investigation shows its internal controls lagged far behind its growth.
The platform reportedly lacked basic role-based access controls. Business development staff had broad visibility into user identifiers and trading data, creating a “God mode” environment. Proper least-privilege systems and audit logs likely would have flagged the activity early. Instead, it allegedly went unnoticed for nearly a year.
The case highlights a common startup flaw: growth and volume are prioritized, while governance is deferred. That works at a small scale. At billions in volume, it becomes a liability.
Axiom has confirmed a full internal audit. But the reputational damage is significant, and regulators may view the alleged $400,000 in insider profits as potential fraud.
