The Indian government has formally confirmed that no changes will be made to its existing crypto taxation regime, disappointing industry stakeholders who had lobbied for relief in the Union Budget 2025. The current framework — imposing a 30% tax on virtual digital asset (VDA) gains and a 1% tax deducted at source (TDS) on all transactions — remains intact, with no provisions for loss offsets or deductions.
At the same time, Indian regulators have reiterated that crypto exchange-traded funds (ETFs) remain unauthorized for domestic investors. Access to international spot Bitcoin ETFs is only available via the Liberalized Remittance Scheme (LRS) and is subject to capital controls and foreign asset taxation rules.
The policy position maintains India as one of the most aggressively taxed jurisdictions for digital asset trading, even as other major economies move toward regulatory clarity and integration of crypto investment products into mainstream financial systems.
AI-Driven Enforcement and Global Reporting Push
India’s tax authorities have ramped up crypto enforcement, recovering ₹437 crore in back taxes by deploying AI and data analytics to identify unreported trades and mismatches in declared income. The crackdown highlights a broader strategy that emphasizes surveillance and compliance over policy reform.
Beginning FY 2025-26, all banks, exchanges, and financial institutions will be required to report VDA transactions under new disclosure obligations. These measures are aligned with the OECD’s Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (CARF), which India is preparing to adopt. CARF aims to enable cross-border data sharing between jurisdictions to curb global tax evasion linked to digital assets.
The integration of CARF positions India alongside G20 peers in the global initiative to track and regulate crypto flows across borders. The move is expected to increase pressure on Indian traders to declare foreign holdings and reduce opportunities for regulatory arbitrage.
New Entry Barrier Raises Eyebrows
In a parallel regulatory development, entities seeking to operate in the Indian crypto market must now receive a “fit and proper” certificate from incumbent service providers — a move that has sparked concerns over fairness and competitive neutrality. Critics argue this could entrench dominant players and discourage new entrants, especially startups and foreign platforms.
This requirement is seen by some as an informal gatekeeping mechanism that could hinder innovation and limit consumer choice in the fast-growing digital asset economy.
Despite global momentum for regulated crypto investment vehicles, India continues to block the launch of domestic ETFs tied to digital assets such as Bitcoin and Ether. Industry leaders have called for the introduction of ETFs and a reduction in TDS from 1% to 0.1% to improve market liquidity. Thus far, those requests have not translated into policy shifts.
The absence of ETF access and high friction on trades may continue to drive Indian users to offshore platforms, often through opaque structures that pose greater risk to investors and reduce local tax capture.
Interestingly, the strict regulatory environment has not dampened retail interest. Crypto trading volumes are surging in India’s Tier-2 and Tier-3 cities, including Jaipur, Lucknow, and Nagpur. These regions accounted for nearly $1.9 billion in trading volume in Q4 FY 24-25, reflecting a shift in user demographics and growing grassroots adoption.
Analysts attribute the growth to younger populations, low barriers to mobile-based trading, and a search for alternative income sources amid stagnant job creation in smaller urban centers.
While India’s crypto ecosystem continues to grow in scale and sophistication, government policy remains anchored in caution, tax revenue protection, and international alignment. With no easing in sight, investors and exchanges alike are preparing for a regulatory landscape defined less by innovation — and more by surveillance, deterrence, and compliance-by-design.
Read more on The Industry Spread
